Amendment summary
Baroness Scott of Bybrook moved amendment 247YYA, to leave out Schedule 13 and insert the following new Schedule—
“SCHEDULE 13 Section 159
AMENDMENTS OF THE CONSERVATION OF HABITATS AND SPECIES REGULATIONS 2017:
EFFECT OF NUTRIENT POLLUTION IN WASTE WATER
PART 1
INTRODUCTORY
1 The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (S.I. 2017/1012) are amended as set out in this Schedule.
PART 2
PLANNING
2 Chapter 2 of Part 6 (assessment of plans and projects: planning) is amended as follows.
3 In regulation 70 (grant of planning permission), after paragraph (4) insert—
“(5) See regulation 85A for provision about the effect of nutrient pollution in waste water.”
4 In regulation 71 (planning permission: duty to review), after paragraph (9) insert—
“(10) See regulation 85A for provision about the effect of nutrient pollution in waste water.”
5 In regulation 77 (general development orders: approval of local planning authority), after paragraph (7) insert—
“(8) See regulation 85B for provision about the effect of nutrient pollution in waste water.”
6 In regulation 79 (special development orders), after paragraph (5) insert—
“(6) See regulation 85A for provision about the effect of nutrient pollution in waste water.”
7 In regulation 80 (local development orders), after paragraph (5) insert—
“(6) See regulation 85A for provision about the effect of nutrient pollution in waste water.”
8 In regulation 81 (neighbourhood development orders), after paragraph (5) insert—
“(5A) See regulation 85A for provision about the effect of nutrient pollution in waste water.”
9 In regulation 82 (simplified planning zones), after paragraph (6) insert—
“(7) See regulation 85A for provision about the effect of nutrient pollution in waste water.”
10 In regulation 83 (enterprise zones), after paragraph (6) insert—
“(7) See regulation 85A for provision about the effect of nutrient pollution in waste water.”
11 After regulation 85 insert—
“Decisions where nutrient pollution in waste water is relevant: general 85A—(1) This regulation applies where—
(a) a competent authority makes a relevant decision,
(b) the potential development is development in England,
(c) urban waste water from any potential development could affect a relevant site, and
(d) that waste water would be dealt with—
(i) under an environmental permit granted under Chapter 2 of Part 2 of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016, or
(ii) in accordance with standard rules published under Chapter 4 of Part 2 of those Regulations.
(2) When making the relevant decision, the competent authority must assume that nutrients in urban waste water from the potential development, whether alone or in combination with other factors, will not adversely affect the relevant site.
(3) Accordingly, a potentially adverse effect on a relevant site caused by nutrients in urban waste water, whether alone or in combination with other factors, is not a ground for the competent authority to determine that—
(a) an appropriate assessment is required by regulation 63(1) or 65(2), or
(b) the potential development will adversely affect the integrity of the relevant site or otherwise have negative implications for the site.
(4) The assumption in paragraph (2) must be made even if a finding (however described) to the contrary is made—
(a) in the conclusions of an appropriate assessment, carried out in accordance with regulation 63(1) or 65(2) and despite paragraph (3)(a),
(b) in representations made by the appropriate nature conservation body, in accordance with regulation 63(3), or
(c) by any other person.
(5) A competent authority is not to be regarded as having failed to comply with a duty imposed by any provision of these Regulations or another enactment because it has acted in accordance with this regulation.
(6) In this regulation—
“potential development”, in relation to a relevant decision, means development—
(a) that could be carried out by virtue of the planning permission, development order or scheme to which the decision relates, or
(b) to which the decision otherwise relates;
“relevant decision” means—
(a) where any of the following provides that the assessment provisions apply in relation to doing a thing, the decision whether or not to do it—
(i) regulation 70 (grant of planning permission),
(ii) regulation 79 (special development orders),
(iii) regulation 80 (local development orders),
(iv) regulation 81 (neighbourhood development orders),
(v) regulation 82 (simplified planning zones), or
(vi) regulation 83 (enterprise zones),
(b) where any of the following provides that the review provisions apply in relation to a matter, a decision under regulation 65(1)(b) on a review of the matter—
(i) regulation 71 (planning permission: duty to review),
(ii) regulation 79 (special development orders),
(iii) regulation 80 (local development orders),
(iv) regulation 81 (neighbourhood development orders),
(v) regulation 82 (simplified planning zones), or
(vi) regulation 83 (enterprise zones);
but this does not apply to a matter mentioned in regulation 71(4) (any review of which would be conducted in accordance with another Chapter),
(c) a decision on an application for a consent, agreement or approval required by a condition or limitation attached to a planning permission, or specified in an order, granted under Part 3, 7 or 13 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990,
(d) a decision whether to grant a reserved matters approval in accordance with section 92(1) of that Act, or
(e) a decision whether to approve a biodiversity gain plan under paragraph 15 (approval of biodiversity gain plan) of Schedule 7A to that Act.
Decisions where nutrient pollution in waste water is relevant: general development orders
85B.—(1) Paragraph (2) applies where—
(a) a local planning authority (within the meaning given by regulation 78(1)) makes a decision on an application under regulation 77 (general development orders: approval of local planning authority) for approval as mentioned in regulation 75 relating to proposed development in England,
(b) urban waste water from the proposed development could affect a relevant site, and
(c) that waste water would be dealt with—
(i) under an environmental permit granted under Chapter 2 of Part 2 of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016, or
(ii) in accordance with standard rules published under Chapter 4 of Part 2 of those Regulations.
(2) When making the decision, the competent authority must assume that nutrients in urban waste water from the proposed development, whether alone or in combination with other factors, will not adversely affect the relevant site.
(3) Accordingly, a potentially adverse effect on a relevant site caused by nutrients in urban waste water, whether alone or in combination with other factors, is not a ground for the competent authority to determine that—
(a) an appropriate assessment is required by regulation 77(6), or
(b) the proposed development will adversely affect the integrity of the relevant site or otherwise have negative implications for the site.
(4) The assumption in paragraph (2) must be made even if a finding (however described) to the contrary is made—
(a) in the conclusions of an appropriate assessment, carried out in accordance with regulation 77(6) and despite paragraph (3)(a),
(b) in the opinion provided by the appropriate nature conservation body, in accordance with regulation 76(4), or
(c) by any other person.
(5) A competent authority is not to be regarded as having failed to comply with a duty imposed by any provision of these Regulations or another enactment because it has acted in accordance with this regulation.
Regulations 85A and 85B: interpretation
85C.—(1) In regulations 85A and 85B—
“nutrients” means nutrients—
(a) comprising nitrogen or phosphorus, or
(b) comprising compounds of nitrogen or phosphorus;
“relevant site” means a habitats site connected to a nutrient affected catchment area;
“urban waste water” has the meaning given by regulation 2(1) of the Urban Waste Water Treatment (England and Wales) Regulations 1994 (S.I. 1994/2841).
(2) In the definition of “relevant site” in paragraph (1) “habitats site” and “nutrient affected catchment area” have the meaning given in section 96J(2) of the Water Industry Act 1991; and a habitats site is connected to a nutrient affected catchment area if water released into the catchment area would drain into the site.”
PART 3
LAND USE PLANS
12 Chapter 8 of Part 6 (assessment of plans and projects: land use plans) is amended as follows.
13 In regulation 105 (assessment of implications for European sites and European offshore marine sites), after paragraph (6) insert—
“(7) See regulation 110A for provision about the effect of nutrient pollution in waste water.”
14 In regulation 106 (assessment of implications for European site: neighbourhood development plans), after paragraph (3) insert—
“(3A) See regulation 110A for provision about the effect of nutrient pollution in waste water.”
15 In regulation 110 (national policy statements), in paragraph (3)(a), for “and 108” substitute “, 108 and 110A”.
16 After regulation 110 insert—
“Assessments under this Chapter: decisions where nutrient pollution in waste water is relevant
110A—(1) Paragraph (2) applies where—
(a) a plan-making authority makes a relevant decision in relation to a land use plan relating to an area in England,
(b) urban waste water from the area to which the plan relates could affect a relevant site, and
(c) that waste water could be dealt with—
(i) under an environmental permit granted under Chapter 2 of Part 2 of the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016, or
(ii) in accordance with standard rules published under Chapter 4 of Part 2 of those Regulations.
(2) When making the relevant decision, the competent authority must assume that nutrients in urban waste water from the area to which the plan relates, whether alone or in combination with other factors, will not adversely affect the relevant site.
(3) Accordingly, a potentially adverse effect on a relevant site caused by nutrients in urban waste water, whether alone or in combination with other factors, is not a ground for the competent authority to determine that—
(a) an appropriate assessment is required by regulation 105(1) or 106(3), or
(b) the proposed use of the land will adversely affect the integrity of the relevant site or otherwise have negative implications for the site.
(4) The assumption in paragraph (2) must be made even if a finding (however described) to the contrary is made—
(a) in the conclusions of an appropriate assessment, carried out in accordance with regulation 105(1) or 106(3) and despite paragraph (3)(a),
(b) in representations made by the appropriate nature conservation body, in accordance with regulation 105(2), or
(c) by any other person.
(5) A competent authority is not to be regarded as having failed to comply with a duty imposed by any provision of these Regulations or another enactment because it has acted in accordance with this regulation.
(6) In this regulation “nutrients”, “relevant site” and “urban waste water” have the meaning given in regulation 85C.
(7) In this regulation “relevant decision” means—
(a) a decision whether to give effect to a land use plan, or
(b) a decision whether to modify or revoke a neighbourhood development plan.””